<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the deal with Cuil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:02:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shooting2sky</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>shooting2sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I wonder why those images come up... I did email them with no response....wonder what my company will show up as on there...curious to check it and its goofy for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why those images come up&#8230; I did email them with no response&#8230;.wonder what my company will show up as on there&#8230;curious to check it and its goofy for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Temple</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Temple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I still see bad image matches, but this one, specifically is gone.  I wonder if they&#039;re combing through reviews to fix obvious ones?  Probably not, but if so that&#039;s very un-Google of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still see bad image matches, but this one, specifically is gone.  I wonder if they&#8217;re combing through reviews to fix obvious ones?  Probably not, but if so that&#8217;s very un-Google of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Gohr</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Gohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Every Cuil review seems to come up with &quot;Cool search but what the heck is up with the images?&quot;. This really makes you wonder. I can understand if their search index might not be as good as Google&#039;s or even with the snippets being a bit weird. But that nobody at Cuil noticed how bad the image algorithm is strikes me a bit odd. If it doesn&#039;t work, why enabling it on the launch? It would have worked just fine without the strange images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every Cuil review seems to come up with &#8220;Cool search but what the heck is up with the images?&#8221;. This really makes you wonder. I can understand if their search index might not be as good as Google&#8217;s or even with the snippets being a bit weird. But that nobody at Cuil noticed how bad the image algorithm is strikes me a bit odd. If it doesn&#8217;t work, why enabling it on the launch? It would have worked just fine without the strange images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Temple</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Temple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Nice to get a response -- at least they&#039;re not faceless, yet.  &quot;Wait and see&quot;, &quot;work in progress&quot; are all good thoughts, but I think Cuil will need to work on their marketing when they do start to work properly.  It just seems like a lot of noise over nothing right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to get a response &#8212; at least they&#8217;re not faceless, yet.  &#8220;Wait and see&#8221;, &#8220;work in progress&#8221; are all good thoughts, but I think Cuil will need to work on their marketing when they do start to work properly.  It just seems like a lot of noise over nothing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmysharinglight</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>kimmysharinglight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I sent Cuil an email about their lack of search results compared to Google.  Cuil answered my email overnight, and I received a personal response that this is a work in progress.  I am going to keep my eye on them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent Cuil an email about their lack of search results compared to Google.  Cuil answered my email overnight, and I received a personal response that this is a work in progress.  I am going to keep my eye on them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Yeah I got a few questions about this at work already. My response was &quot;wait and see&quot; since this is so new and quality seems like a crapshoot right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I got a few questions about this at work already. My response was &#8220;wait and see&#8221; since this is so new and quality seems like a crapshoot right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workwebplay.com/?p=19#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention. Yeah, these results are pretty goofy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention. Yeah, these results are pretty goofy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
